48 pages 1 hour read

Lydia Chukovskaya

Sofia Petrovna

Fiction | Novella | Adult | Published in 1965

A modern alternative to SparkNotes and CliffsNotes, SuperSummary offers high-quality Study Guides with detailed chapter summaries and analysis of major themes, characters, and more.

Chapter 16-AfterwordChapter Summaries & Analyses

Chapter 16 Summary

A year passes, during which Sofia hears nothing from Kolya. With her age she has to start using a cane. She finds typing work at a library, where she has no interaction with her coworkers. She spends her meager salary on stockpiling Kolya’s favorite provisions in case he finally writes and asks for food. Sofia eats little herself and stops regularly heating and cleaning her apartment. The only things she keeps clean are Kolya’s books, radio, and cogwheel prototype.

Sofia writes three letters to Stalin asking for any information about her son. She receives no reply. Periodically, she goes to the legal advice bureau to speak to the friendly defense attorneys about Kolya—they’re unable to do anything to help.

One day Mrs. Kiparisova surprises Sofia at her apartment. (Mrs. Kiparisova has avoided Sofia for fear that the NKVD will connect Kolya’s case to her husband’s.) Some prisoners have been released. Sofia must inquire about Kolya at the prosecutor’s office.

After Mrs. Kiparisova leaves, the nurse and the house manager barge into Sofia’s apartment. The nurse has reported her to the house manager for cooking in her room: “She’s scorned us ever since we found her systematically stealing the kerosene. Her son’s in a camp, exposed as an enemy of the people, she herself has no fixed occupation, in short, an unreli­able element” (98). The house manager threatens to report her to the police for the infraction. After they leave, Sofia breaks down. Mrs. Degtyarenko comes to comfort her, explaining that the nurse wants the apartment for her newlywed daughter and the house manager for his girlfriend.

Chapter 17 Summary

Sofia dreams of the reparations the state will make to Kolya for his wrongful imprisonment. After work the following day she thinks of buying the Leica camera he always wanted as a homecoming gift. She plans to repurpose the storage closet as a darkroom.

Sofia tells Mrs. Degtyarenko that she’s received a registered letter informing her of Kolya’s release (she hasn’t). Surprised to find herself making up a story, Sofia continues that Kolya will visit in a few months after working and taking a much-needed vacation. Returning to her apartment, Sofia looks at herself in the mirror, wondering if Kolya will recognize her with how much she’s aged in the past year.

While out buying bread Sofia encounters the friendly accountant from the publishing house. She’s shocked to learn that Timofeyev was arrested. The accountant—while unaware that Kolya had been arrested—is nonetheless happy to hear of his release. When Sofia returns home her mailbox is still empty.

Chapter 18 Summary

In the kitchen the following morning Sofia continues her lie, telling the nurse and Mrs. Degtyarenko that Kolya was promoted, was approved for a luxurious vacation in Crimea, and is engaged to a loyal young woman. For the first time in a year the nurse isn’t hostile.

With the day off work Sofia cleans her neglected apartment for Kolya’s return. That afternoon a letter arrives—without a return address or postmark but written in Kolya’s hand. After asking about her, Alik, and Natasha, Kolya writes that his former classmate Sashka (who made an antisemitic comment to Alik) told the NKVD that he recruited Kolya to a terrorist organization. Beaten until permanently deaf in one ear, Kolya confessed to this fabricated crime. He beseeches Sofia to campaign for his release—he won’t last much longer in the gulag.

Sofia rushes to confer with Mrs. Kiparisova. At her apartment Sofia finds Mrs. Kiparisova and her daughter preparing for deportation (Mr. Kiparisov has been sentenced to 15 years). After pondering Kolya’s letter, Mrs. Kiparisova ushers Sofia into the bathroom to talk away from the phone, which could be bugged. She urges Sofia not to write the appeal Kolya asks for: “Do you really think you can write that the investigator beat him? You can’t even think such a thing, let alone write it. They’ve forgotten to deport you, but if you write an appeal—they’ll remember. And they’ll send your son farther away, too” (108). Furthermore, since the letter was delivered surreptitiously by someone Kolya recruited to do so, and not officially through the mail, there’s no evidence that the letter actually came from Kolya.

Sofia returns to her apartment, where she deliberates. She knows the letter is from Kolya—the handwriting is unmistakably his—but she has no way to prove it. Seeing the futility of taking it to the prosecutor or defense attorney, she burns it.

Afterword Summary

The afterword is a translated excerpt from Chukovskaya’s 1979 book The Process of Exclusion (only published in Russian, as Процесс исключения) about her expulsion from the Soviet Writers’ Union in 1974.

Chukovskaya faced many hurdles in getting Sofia Petrovna published. In the winter of 1939 she wrote the manuscript in a school notebook, basing the story on her experiences waiting in lines outside prisons for the previous two years. Having had her apartment searched three times by the NKVD and her belongings confiscated, Chukovskaya entrusted the sole copy of her manuscript to a friend, who himself faced death if found with it. After Hitler invaded the Soviet Union in 1941, her friend was trapped in Leningrad during the siege. Before dying of starvation he gave the manuscript to his sister, who eventually returned it to Chukovskaya.

Following Stalin’s death in 1953 and nearly a decade of De-Stalinization, Sofia Petrovna was officially approved for publication in the Soviet Union in 1962: The 22nd Congress of the Communist Party of the Soviet Union, led by Nikita Khrushchev, expected every publishing house to publish something about the abuses of Stalin’s regime. The Sovietsky Pisatel publishing house paid Chukovskaya most of her fee and expedited production of Sofia Petrovna.

Then the political climate changed in 1963: The Communist Party began to feel that, after a decade of overturning Stalin’s legacy and rehabilitating those wrongfully imprisoned in his gulags, it was time to focus on the future. In a volte-face the chief editor at Sovietsky Pisatel reneged on their contract to publish Sofia Petrovna, citing ideological flaws.

Chukovskaya sued the publishing house for the remainder of her fee, arguing that their contract obligated them to pay her in full. After two years of delays, her case went to trial. The judge ruled in her favor, and Sovietsky Pisatel paid her within days. While Sofia Petrovna still wasn’t officially published, it circulated underground as samizdat. A copy made it to France, where it was published in 1965 under an altered title (The Deserted House). Shortly thereafter it was published in the United States under the correct title and translated into other languages. Finally, with the dissolution of the Soviet Union imminent, Sofia Petrovna was officially published there in 1988.

Chapter 16-Afterword Analysis

In the final chapters the toll of Kolya’s arrest on Sofia becomes fully apparent. Once tidy and energetic, she now uses a cane—in just over a year she’s become the babushka she saw Mrs. Kiparisova become following her husband’s arrest. Sofia also begins neglecting herself, eating little to nothing, not heating her apartment, and letting dirt accumulate. All of her money and energy goes into preparing for the day when Kolya will write asking for provisions. In her longing for his return Sofia starves herself while she endlessly stockpiles his favorite food. Through Sofia, Chukovskaya expresses the human toll of the Great Terror and The False Promise of Stalinism. Once a devoted mother and industrious worker, a paragon of the new Soviet woman, Sofia is “rewarded” for her patriotism by being stripped of the roles that gave her life meaning.

Meanwhile, Chukovskaya inserts some dark humor to lighten the mood and underscore the absurdity of the Great Terror. When Sofia tells the accountant from the publishing house that Kolya has been released (he hasn’t), he says, “Ah! Allow me to congratulate you. I didn’t even know your son had been arrested” (104). Arrest is so commonplace that it can go unnoticed.

The terror of the “little person” becomes all the more apparent in these final chapters. The nurse, having already maligned Sofia behind her back, uses the fact that she cooks in her room as a pretext for getting her apartment for her newlywed daughter. It’s also implied that there’s a petty, vindictive reason for Kolya’s arrest. In his letter he writes that his former classmate Sashka told the NKVD that he recruited Kolya to a terrorist organization. It seems that Sashka falsely accused Kolya in retaliation for the mock trial Kolya spearheaded against him. As with many other cases throughout the novella, an unsubstantiated accusation is enough to get someone ostracized, fired, or sent to the gulag; under the umbrella of Stalin’s political paranoia, characters fabricate accusations for personal gain.

In these chapters Kolya’s absence becomes so unbearable to Sofia that she has to pretend he’s been released. This fantasy is the only escape from the irreconcilable dissonance between her faith in Kolya and her faith in the state. As Chukovskaya writes in the afterword:

Sofia Petrovna knows full well that Kolya has committed no crime, that he is incapable of it, that to the depths of his being he is loyal to the party, to his factory, to Comrade Stalin personally. But if she is to believe in herself, not in the prosecutor and the newspapers, […] then the universe will collapse […] Sofia Petrovna tries to believe in her son and the prosecutor at the same time, and in the attempt goes mad (112).

By telling everyone that her son has been released, is going on vacation, and is getting married, Sofia gets to pretend that finally her life has returned to normal, even if in private she despairs that she’s still received no word from him. It’s not just that Kolya is imprisoned but that Sofia is given no information about him and is consigned to a limbo in which she can neither grieve nor move on. A year of not knowing if her son is alive or dead, if he will be returning in 10 days or 10 years, is enough to drive Sofia to her desperate fantasy.

The terror imposed by the Great Purge is another contributing factor to Sofia’s fantasy. By this point, not even those who share her home, the nurse and Mrs. Degtyarenko, will associate with her as the relative of a saboteur. The fearful atmosphere drives Sofia into such isolation that she tries to escape into a fantasy world in which her isolation is only temporary: Kolya has been released from prison and will presumably be returning to her soon. In this fantasy Sofia is completely alone: “She was happy and excited, she even walked faster. And she wanted to go around telling people all the time: ‘Kolya’s been released. Did you hear? They’ve released Kolya!’ But there was no one to tell” (103). The novella’s exploration of Isolation and the Culture of Fear culminates in the final lines, when, fearing further persecution, Sofia burns Kolya’s letter. In destroying her one connection to the last person in her life, Sofia’s isolation becomes absolute.

Sofia’s conversation with Mrs. Kiparisova about Kolya’s letter encapsulates the wrenching dissonance of Doublethink: The State Versus the Individual. For the first time since Kolya’s arrest she holds evidence that his arrest is the “mistake” she thought it was all along. Yet, as Mrs. Kiparisova reminds her, such evidence means nothing in a state where the truth is whatever the NKVD says it is: “Do you really think you can write that the investigator beat him? You can’t even think such a thing, let alone write it” (108). Knowing that Mrs. Kiparisova is right that showing the letter to the prosecutor will only make things worse, Sofia concedes that the best thing to do is burn Kolya’s letter. In destroying the only piece of her son she’s seen in over a year, she acknowledges that the NKVD is too powerful to fight, and she becomes cruelly complicit in covering up the truth. This is an unequivocal victory for the state in the epistemological war between it and the individual. Sofia’s eyes may be opened to the injustice of life in the USSR, but her awakening changes nothing about her circumstances or Kolya’s. Next to the might of the state, the individual is powerless.